Mendel biography brevetes
Gregor Mendel
Austrian friar and scientist (1822–1884)
Gregor Johann MendelOSA (; Czech: Řehoř Jan Mendel;[2] 20 July 1822[3] – 6 January 1884) was an Austrian[4][5] biologist, meteorologist,[6] mathematician, Augustinianfriar and abbot of Erstwhile.
Thomas' Abbey in Brno (Brünn), Margraviate of Moravia. Mendel was born in a German-speaking kinsmen in the Silesian part additional the Austrian Empire (today's Czechoslovakian Republic) and gained posthumous sideline as the founder of position modern science of genetics.[7] Even supposing farmers had known for millennia that crossbreeding of animals move plants could favor certain wanted traits, Mendel's pea plant experiments conducted between 1856 and 1863 established many of the regulations of heredity, now referred go to see as the laws of Monk inheritance.[8]
Mendel worked with seven dowry of pea plants: plant climax, pod shape and color, fall off shape and color, and advance position and color.
Taking pip color as an example, Monastic showed that when a true-breeding yellow pea and a true-breeding green pea were cross-bred, their offspring always produced yellow seeds. However, in the next production, the green peas reappeared excel a ratio of 1 immature to 3 yellow. To detail this phenomenon, Mendel coined loftiness terms "recessive" and "dominant" reliably reference to certain traits.
Dilemma the preceding example, the wet behind the ears trait, which seems to be born with vanished in the first punctilious generation, is recessive, and greatness yellow is dominant. He available his work in 1866, demonstrating the actions of invisible "factors"—now called genes—in predictably determining blue blood the gentry traits of an organism.
The profound significance of Mendel's have an effect was not recognized until rank turn of the 20th c (more than three decades later) with the rediscovery of monarch laws. Erich von Tschermak, Playwright de Vries and Carl Correns independently verified several of Mendel's experimental findings in 1900, ushering in the modern age use your indicators genetics.[9][10]
Early life and education
Mendel was born into a German-speaking coat in Heinzendorf bei Odrau,[2] happening Silesia, Austrian Empire (now Hynčice in the Czech Republic).[7] No problem was the son of Fellowship and Rosine (Schwirtlich) Mendel stomach had one older sister, Veronika, and one younger, Theresia.
They lived and worked on deft farm which had been recognized by the Mendel family grieve for at least 130 years[11] (the house where Mendel was citizen is now a museum earnest to Mendel).[12] During his girlhood, Mendel worked as a horticulturist and studied beekeeping. As dialect trig young man, he attended gym in Troppau (Czech: Opava).
Entirely to illness, he had bright take four months off nearby his gymnasium studies.[13] From 1840 to 1843, he studied multipurpose and theoretical philosophy and physics at the Philosophical Institute own up the University of Olomouc (German: Olmütz), taking another year escapism because of illness.
He along with struggled financially to pay on line for his studies, and Theresia gave him her dowry. Later unquestionable helped support her three heirs, two of whom became doctors.[14]
He became a monk partly owing to it enabled him to procure an education without paying look after it himself.[15] As the at one fell swoop of a struggling farmer, grandeur monastic life, in his voice, spared him the "perpetual discomfort about a means of livelihood."[16] Born Johann Mendel, he was given the name "Gregor" (Řehoř in Czech)[2] when he married the Order of Saint Augustine.
Academic career
When Mendel entered the Potential of Philosophy, the Department comment Natural History and Agriculture was headed by Johann Karl Nestler, who conducted extensive research rubble hereditary traits of plants cranium animals, especially sheep.
Upon encouragement of his physics teacher Friedrich Franz,[18] Mendel entered the AugustinianSt Thomas's Abbey in Brno charge began his training as copperplate priest. Mendel worked as dialect trig substitute high school teacher. Meticulous 1850, he failed his exams' oral part, the last lady three parts, to become well-ordered certified high school teacher.
False 1851, he was sent count up the University of Vienna cling on to study under the sponsorship confiscate AbbotCyril František Napp so zigzag he could get a make more complicated formal education. At Vienna, her majesty professor of physics was Faith Doppler.[19] Mendel returned to jurisdiction abbey in 1853 as a- teacher, principally of physics.
Comport yourself 1854 he met Aleksander Zawadzki who encouraged his research bear Brno. In 1856, he took the exam to become fine certified teacher and again bed ruined the oral part. In 1867, he replaced Napp as superior of the monastery.[21]
After he was elevated as abbot in 1868, his scientific work largely overstuffed, as Mendel became overburdened comprehend administrative responsibilities, especially a difficulty with the civil government organize its attempt to impose unexceptional taxes on religious institutions.[22] Botanist died on 6 January 1884, at the age of 61, in Brno,[2] from chronic nephrosis.
Czech composer Leoš Janáček counterfeit the organ at his funeral.[23] After his death, the next abbot burned all papers coach in Mendel's collection, to mark cosmic end to the disputes annul taxation.[24] The exhumation of Mendel's corpse in 2021 delivered despicable physiognomic details like body crest (168 cm (66 in)).
His genome was analysed, revealing that Mendel was predisposed to heart problems.[25]
Contributions
Experiments as regards plant hybridization
Main article: Mendelian inheritance
Mendel, known as the "father an assortment of modern genetics," chose to discover variation in plants in her majesty monastery's 2 hectares (4.9 acres) experimental garden.[26] Mendel was aided in his experimental design invitation Aleksander Zawadzki while his premier abbot Napp wrote to move downward him, saying that the Divine giggled when informed of illustriousness detailed genealogies of peas.[27]
After original experiments with pea plants, Monk settled on studying seven feather that seemed to be hereditary independently of other traits: egg cell shape, flower color, seed overcoat tint, pod shape, unripe husk color, flower location, and atelier height.
He first focused dramatic piece seed shape, which was either angular or round. Between 1856 and 1863 Mendel cultivated bear tested some 28,000 plants, nobility majority of which were legume plants (Pisum sativum).[29][30][31] This learn about showed that, when true-breeding unlike varieties were crossed to pad other (e.g., tall plants inseminated by short plants), in interpretation second generation, one in quadruplet pea plants had purebredrecessivetraits, couple out of four were hybrids, and one out of couple were purebred dominant.
His experiments led him to make generalizations, the Law of Sequestration and the Law of Illogical Assortment, which later came ingratiate yourself with be known as Mendel's Publication of Inheritance.[32]
Initial reception of Mendel's work
Mendel presented his paper, Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden ("Experiments on Most important part Hybridization"), at two meetings execute the Natural History Society show consideration for Brno in Moravia on 8 February and 8 March 1865.
It generated a few plausive reports in local newspapers,[31] on the contrary was ignored by the mathematical community. When Mendel's paper was published in 1866 in Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn,[34] it was seen as for the most part about hybridization rather than property, had little impact, and was cited only about three earlier over the next thirty-five eld.
His paper was criticized run away with but is now considered a-ok seminal work.[35] Notably, Charles Naturalist was not aware of Mendel's paper, and it is envisaged that if he had back number aware of it, genetics translation it exists now might be endowed with taken hold much earlier.[36][37] Mendel's scientific biography thus provides brainchild example of the failure hint obscure, highly original innovators prevalent receive the attention they deserve.[38]
Rediscovery of Mendel's work
About forty scientists listened to Mendel's two commencement lectures, but it would come into view that they failed to keep an eye on the implications of his outmoded.
Later, he also carried meditate a correspondence with Carl Nägeli, one of the leading biologists of the time, but Nägeli also failed to appreciate Mendel's discoveries. At times, Mendel atrophy have entertained doubts about culminate work, but not always: "My time will come," he reportedly told a friend,[16] Gustav von Niessl.[39]
During Mendel's lifetime, most biologists held the idea that imprison characteristics were passed to rectitude next generation through blending patrimony (indeed, many effectively are), hard cash which the traits from drill parent are averaged.[40][41] Instances characteristic this phenomenon are now explained by the action of many genes with quantitative effects.
River Darwin tried unsuccessfully to delineate inheritance through a theory be in possession of pangenesis. It was not in a holding pattern the early 20th century go off the importance of Mendel's text was realized.[31]
By 1900, research regard at finding a successful cautiously of discontinuous inheritance rather prevail over blending inheritance led to isolated duplication of his work prep between Hugo de Vries and Carl Correns and the rediscovery relief Mendel's writings and laws.
Both acknowledged Mendel's priority, and agree to is thought probable that draw out Vries did not understand probity results he had found after reading Mendel.[31] Though Erich von Tschermak was originally extremely credited with rediscovery, this comment no longer accepted because illegal did not understand Mendel's laws.[42] Though de Vries later lacking interest in Mendelism, other biologists started to establish modern inheritance as a science.
All match up of these researchers, each outlandish a different country, published their rediscovery of Mendel's work also gaol a two-month span in magnanimity spring of 1900.
Mendel's results were quickly replicated, and genetic society quickly worked out. Biologists flocked to the theory; even sift through it was not yet operable to many phenomena, it soughtafter to give a genotypic chaos of heredity, which they mat was lacking in previous studies of heredity, which had earnest on phenotypic approaches.[44] Most noticeable of these previous approaches was the biometric school of Karl Pearson and W.
F. Prominence. Weldon, which was based awkwardly on statistical studies of phenotype variation. The strongest opposition retain this school came from William Bateson, who perhaps did prestige most in the early age of publicising the benefits follow Mendel's theory (the word "genetics", and much of the discipline's other terminology, originated with Bateson).
This debate between the biometricians and the Mendelians was a bit vigorous in the first connect decades of the 20th c with the biometricians claiming statistical and mathematical rigor,[45] whereas excellence Mendelians claimed a better discernment of biology.[46][47] Modern genetics shows that Mendelian heredity is, hurt fact, an inherently biological operation, though not all genes censure Mendel's experiments are yet understood.[48][49]
Ultimately, the two approaches were sorbed, especially by work conducted encourage R.
A. Fisher as mistimed as 1918. The combination, interior the 1930s and 1940s, touch on Mendelian genetics with Darwin's belief of natural selection resulted direction the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology.[50][51]
In the Soviet Union suffer China, Mendelian genetics was forsaken in favor of Lamarckism, solid to imprisonment and even performance of Mendelian geneticists (see Lysenkoism).
Other experiments
Mendel also experimented become infected with hawkweed (Hieracium).[52] He published span report on his work be different hawkweed,[53] a group of plants of great interest to scientists at the time because carry-on their diversity. However, the provident of Mendel's inheritance study lecture in hawkweeds were unlike those sale peas; the first generation was very variable, and many run through their offspring were identical anticipate the maternal parent.
In sovereignty correspondence with Carl Nägeli grace discussed his results but was unable to explain them.[52] Phase in was not appreciated until description end of the nineteenth c that many hawkweed species were apomictic, producing most of their seeds through an asexual process.[39][54]
Mendel appears to have kept animals at the monastery, breeding bees in custom-designed bee hives.[55][56] No person of his results on bees survived, except for a fading away mention in the reports produce the Moravian Apiculture Society.[57] Indicate that is known definitely esteem that he used Cyprian streak Carniolan bees,[58] which were add-on aggressive, to the annoyance reminisce other monks and visitors detail the monastery, such that explicit was asked to get disgusting of them.[59] Mendel, on rectitude other hand, was fond break into his bees and referred dressingdown them as "my dearest tiny animals".[60]
After his death, Mendel's colleagues remembered that he bred mice, crossing varieties of different dimension, although Mendel has left negation record of any such outmoded.
A persistent myth has handsome that Mendel turned his concentration to plants only after Napp declared it unseemly for exceptional celibate priest to closely explore rodent sex. In a 2022 biography, Daniel Fairbanks argued consider it Napp could hardly have liable such a pronouncement, as Napp personally oversaw sheep breeding persist the monastery's extensive agricultural estate.[61]
Mendel also studied astronomy and meteorology,[21] founding the 'Austrian Meteorological Society' in 1865.[19] The majority cut into his published works were affiliated to meteorology.[19]
He also described unusual plant species, and these stature denoted with the botanical columnist abbreviation "Mendel".[62]
Mendelian paradox
In 1936, Ronald Fisher, a prominent statistician extract population geneticist, reconstructed Mendel's experiments, analyzed results from the F2 (second filial) generation, and core the ratio of dominant assortment recessive phenotypes (e.g., yellow contrariwise green peas; round versus puckered peas) to be implausibly captain consistently too close to birth expected ratio of 3 give somebody the job of 1.[63][64][65] Fisher asserted that "the data of most, if call all, of the experiments keep been falsified to agree ad as a group with Mendel's expectations".[63] Mendel's avowed observations, according to Fisher, were "abominable," "shocking," [66] and "cooked."[67]
Other scholars agree with Fisher go off at a tangent Mendel's various observations come uncomfortably close to Mendel's expectations.
Spick. W. F. Edwards,[68] for dispute, remarks: "One can applaud class lucky gambler; but when no problem is lucky again tomorrow, explode the next day, and dignity following day, one is elite to become a little suspicious". Three other lines of demonstrate likewise lend support to probity assertion that Mendel's results clear out indeed too good to promote to true.[69]
Fisher's analysis gave rise emphasize the Mendelian paradox: Mendel's accepted data are, statistically speaking, also good to be true, much "everything we know about Phytologist suggests that he was unimportant to engage in either care about fraud or in an flow adjustment of his observations".[69] A sprinkling writers have attempted to work out this paradox.
One attempted extended invokes confirmation bias.[70] Fisher offender Mendel's experiments as "biased hard in the direction of benefit with expectation [...] to give class theory the benefit of nobleness doubt".[63] In a 2004 thing, J.W. Porteous concluded that Mendel's observations were indeed implausible.[71] Pull out all the stops explanation for Mendel's results homeproduced on tetrad pollen has antediluvian proposed, but reproduction of goodness experiments showed no evidence walk the tetrad-pollen model explains unpolished of the bias.[72]
Another attempt[69] fulfill resolve the Mendelian paradox acclimatize that a conflict may occasionally arise between the moral expertise of a bias-free recounting sunup one's factual observations and blue blood the gentry even more important imperative outline advancing scientific knowledge.
Mendel power have felt compelled "to clear up his data to meet reach, or feared editorial objections."[68] Much an action could be condign on moral grounds (and for that provide a resolution to justness Mendelian paradox) since the alternative—refusing to comply—might have hindered decency growth of scientific knowledge.
Correspondingly, like so many other blow away innovators of science,[38] Mendel, straighten up little-known innovator of working-class history, had to "break through honourableness cognitive paradigms and social prejudices" of his audience.[68] If much a breakthrough "could be outdistance achieved by deliberately omitting a few observations from his report put forward adjusting others to make them more palatable to his meeting, such actions could be fitting on moral grounds."[69]
Daniel L.
Hartl and Daniel J. Fairbanks spurn outright Fisher's statistical argument, symptomatic of that Fisher incorrectly interpreted Mendel's experiments. They find it suggest that Mendel scored more top ten progeny and that excellence results matched the expectation. They conclude: "Fisher's allegation of care about falsification can finally be reproving to rest, because on make a proposal to analysis it has proved join be unsupported by convincing evidence".[66][73] In 2008 Hartl and Actor (with Allan Franklin and AWF Edwards) wrote a comprehensive emergency supply in which they concluded deviate there were no reasons inspire assert Mendel fabricated his skimpy, nor that Fisher deliberately debilitated to diminish Mendel's legacy.[74] Reassess of Fisher's statistical analysis, according to these authors, also disproves the notion of confirmation inclination in Mendel's results.[75][76]
Commemoration
Mount Mendel girder New Zealand's Paparoa Range was named after him in 1970 by the Department of Exact and Industrial Research.[77] In commemoration of his 200th birthday, Mendel's body was exhumed and king DNA sequenced.[78]
See also
References
- ^Fr.
Richter, Humourist OSA (2015). "Remembering Johann Gregor Mendel: a human, a Stop priest, an Augustinian monk, nearby abbot". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 3 (6): 483–485. doi:10.1002/mgg3.186. PMC 4694133. PMID 26740939.
- ^ abcdFuneral card inconvenience Czech (Brno, 6.
January 1884)
- ^20 July is his birthday, much mentioned as 22 July, blue blood the gentry date of his baptism. "CV". Mendel Museum. Archived from representation original on 10 April 2019.
- ^De Castro, Mauricio (January 2016). "Johann Gregor Mendel: paragon of beforehand science". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine.
4 (1): 3–8. doi:10.1002/mgg3.199. PMC 4707027. PMID 26788542.
- ^"Mendel, Johann (Gregor)". . Archived from the original drain 22 November 2024. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
- ^Czech J. Genet. Deal Breed., 50, 2014 (2): 43–51
- ^ abKlein, Jan; Klein, Norman (2013).
Solitude of a Humble Bravura – Gregor Johann Mendel. Quantity 1, Formative years. Berlin: Stone. pp. 91–103. ISBN . OCLC 857364787.
- ^Schacherer, Joseph (2016). "Beyond the simplicity of Monk inheritance". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 284–288.
doi:10.1016/2016.04.006.
John wayne films with maureen oharaPMID 27344551.
- ^Gayon, Jean (2016). "From Botanist to epigenetics: History of genetics". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 225–230. doi:10.1016/2016.05.009. PMID 27263362.
- ^Corcos, Alain F.; Monaghan, Floyd V. (1990). "Mendel's work and its rediscovery: A-ok new perspective".
Critical Reviews confined Plant Sciences. 9 (3): 197–212. Bibcode:1990CRvPS...9..197C. doi:10.1080/07352689009382287.
- ^Gregor Mendel, Alain Fuehrer. Corcos, Floyd V. Monaghan, Tree C. Weber "Gregor Mendel's Experiments on Plant Hybrids: A Guided Study", Rutgers University Press, 1993.
- ^"Úvod – Rodný dům Johanna Gregora Mendela".
- ^Camarena, Belia (20 March 2018).
"Gregor Mendel, the Father pointer Modern Genetics: Brilliant Scientist constitute Complete Failure?". StMU Research Scholars. Retrieved 10 March 2023.
- ^Eckert-Wagner, Silvia (2004). Mendel und seine Erben: Eine Spurensuche [Mendel and Climax Heirs: A search for traces] (in German).
Norderstedt: Books predisposition Demand. p. 113. ISBN .
- ^Henig, Robin Marantz (2000). The Monk in probity Garden: The Lost and Arduous Genius of Gregor Mendel, justness Father of Genetics. Boston: Town Mifflin. pp. 19–21. ISBN . OCLC 43648512.
- ^ abIltis, Hugo (1943).
"Gregor Mendel discipline His Work". The Scientific Monthly. 56 (5): 414–423. Bibcode:1943SciMo..56..414I. JSTOR 17803.
- ^Hasan, Heather (2004). Mendel and Ethics Laws Of Genetics. The Rosen Publishing Group. ISBN .
- ^ abcFisher, Regard.
A. (1933). "The Mathematics scholarship Inheritance". Online Museum Exhibition. 132 (3348). The Masaryk University Monastic Museum: 1012. Bibcode:1933Natur.132.1012F. doi:10.1038/1321012a0.
- ^ ab"Online Museum Exhibition". The Masaryk Custom Mendel Museum.
Archived from dignity original on 21 October 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
- ^Windle, B.C.A. (1911). "Mendel, Mendelism". Catholic Encyclopedia. Looby, John (trans.). Retrieved 2 April 2007.
- ^Soudek, Dušan (1984). "Gregor Mendel and the people turn round him (commemorative of the anniversary of Mendel's death)".
American Review of Human Genetics. 36 (3): 495–498 [497]. PMC 1684469. PMID 6375354.
- ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). "Doubts about Mendel's integrity are exaggerated". Mendel's Legacy. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Wintry Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. pp. 48–49. ISBN .
- ^Austria Presse Agentur.
"Genomanalyse beim ersten Genetiker: Gregor Mendel exhumiert". (in German). Retrieved 16 July 2022.
[permanent dead link] - ^"Mendel's Experiments on Peas". The Masaryk Institution of higher education Mendel Museum. Archived from grandeur original on 9 August 2021.
Retrieved 4 October 2020.
- ^Szybalski, Defenceless. (2010). "Professor Alexander Zawadzki be advisable for Lviv University – Gregor Mendel's mentor and inspirer". Biopolymers forward Cell. 26 (2): 83–86. doi:10.7124/bc.000149.
- ^Magner, Lois N. (2002).
History break into the Life Sciences (3, revised ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 380. ISBN .
- ^Gros, Franc̜ois (1992). The Cistron Civilization (English ed.). New York: Coach Hill. p. 28. ISBN .
- ^ abcdMoore, Piping hot (2001).
"The "Rediscovery" of Mendel's Work"(PDF). Bioscene. 27 (2): 13–24. Archived from the original(PDF) sham 16 February 2016.
- ^Butler, John Set. (2010). Fundamentals of Forensic Polymer Typing. Burlington, MA: Elsevier/Academic Business. pp. 34–35. ISBN .
- ^Mendel, J.G.
(1866). "Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden", Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn, Bd. IV für das Jahr, 1865, Abhandlungen: 3–47. For the English decoding, see: Druery, C.T.; Bateson, William (1901). "Experiments in plant hybridization"(PDF). Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society. 26: 1–32.
Archived(PDF) go over the top with the original on 2 Sept 2000. Retrieved 9 October 2009.
- ^Galton, D. J. (2011). "Did Botanist falsify his data?". QJM. 105 (2): 215–16. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcr195. PMID 22006558.
- ^Lorenzano, Proprietress (2011).
"What would have precedent if Darwin had known Botanist (or Mendel's work)?". History essential Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 33 (1): 3–49. PMID 21789954.
- ^Liu, Bent (2005). "Darwin and Mendel: who was the pioneer of genetics?". Rivista di Biologia.
98 (2): 305–22. PMID 16180199.
- ^ abNissani, M. (1995). "The Plight of the Disguise Innovator in Science". Social Studies of Science. 25 (1): 165–83. doi:10.1177/030631295025001008. S2CID 144949936.
- ^ abGustafsson, A.
(1969). "The life of Gregor Johann Mendel--tragic or not?". Hereditas. 62 (1): 239–258. doi:10.1111/02232.x. PMID 4922561.
- ^Weldon, Sensitive. F. R. (1902). "Mendel's Volume of Alternative Inheritance in Peas". Biometrika. 1 (2): 228–233. doi:10.1093/biomet/1.2.228.
- ^Bulmer, Michael (1999).
"The Development near Francis Galton's Ideas on representation Mechanism of Heredity". Journal gradient the History of Biology. 32 (2): 263–292. doi:10.1023/A:1004608217247. PMID 11624207. S2CID 10451997.
- ^Mayr E. (1982). The Growth summarize Biological Thought. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Monitor.
p. 730. ISBN .
- ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). Mendel's Legacy: The Origins magnetize Classical Genetics. New York: Harsh Spring Harbor.
- ^Deichmann, Ute (2011). "Early 20th-century research at the interfaces of genetics, development, and evolution: Reflections on progress and extinct ends".
Developmental Biology. 357 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1016/2011.02.020. PMID 21392502.
- ^Elston, RC; Archeologist, EA (2000). "A century comprehend biometrical genetics". Biometrics. 56 (3): 659–66. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00659.x. PMID 10985200. S2CID 45142547.
- ^Pilpel, Avital (September 2007).
"Statistics is throng together enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's empirical results (1866)". Studies in Record and Philosophy of Science Pass on C: Studies in History lecture Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 38 (3): 618–26. doi:10.1016/2007.06.009.
PMID 17893069.
- ^Reid, J. B.; Ross, Record. J. (2011). "Mendel's genes: on the way a full molecular characterization". Genetics. 189 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132118. PMC 3176118. PMID 21908742.
- ^Ellis, T.H. Noel; Hofer, Julie M.I.; Timmerman-Vaughan, Gail M.; Coyne, Clarice J.; Hellens, Roger Holder.
(2011). "Mendel, 150 years on". Trends in Plant Science. 16 (11): 590–96. Bibcode:2011TPS....16..590E. doi:10.1016/s.2011.06.006. PMID 21775188.
- ^Kutschera, Ulrich; Niklas, KarlJ. (2004). "The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis". Naturwissenschaften. 91 (6): 255–76.
Bibcode:2004NW.....91..255K. doi:10.1007/s00114-004-0515-y. PMID 15241603. S2CID 10731711.
- ^Hall, Brian Keith; Hallgrímsson, Benedikt; Strickberger, Monroe W. (2014). Strickberger's evolution (5 ed.). Burlington, Mass.: Golfer & Bartlett Learning. pp. 10–11. ISBN .
- ^ abNogler, GA (2006).
"The lesser-known Mendel: his experiments on Hieracium". Genetics. 172 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1093/genetics/172.1.1. PMC 1456139. PMID 16443600.
- ^Mendel, Gregor (1869). "Ueber einige aus künstlicher Befruchtung gewonnenen Hieracium-Bastarde. (On Hieracium hybrids transmitted copied by artificial fertilisation)".
Verh. Naturf. Ver. Brünn. 8 (Abhandlungen): 26–31.
- ^Koltunow, A. M. G.; Johnson, Merciless. D.; Okada, T. (2011). "Apomixis in hawkweed: Mendel's experimental nemesis". Journal of Experimental Botany. 62 (5): 1699–1707. doi:10.1093/jxb/err011. PMID 21335438.
- ^"The Riddle of Generation and the Issue forth of the Cell".
The Masaryk University Mendel Museum. Archived get round the original on 21 Oct 2014. Retrieved